Where might duplicate records exist?
Potential matches are shown with the identifiers and similarity rule used. Nothing is merged automatically.
Candidate data quality · Fixed-scope review
See what needs cleaning before you change your ATS.
The Candidate Data Quality Snapshot reviews one agreed anonymised export and shows where duplicate, incomplete, conflicting and stale records may need attention. You receive the evidence, exceptions and next actions—not a vague recommendation to buy another system.
£750 fixed price. The fee is credited against a later implementation Sprint when both parties agree that a Sprint is appropriate.
One agreed export · anonymised before reviewClear exceptions · source values stay visibleHuman decisions · no silent merges or ranking
What you receive
A usable starting point for a controlled clean-up.
- A quantified summary of potential duplicate records
- Missing, inconsistent and conflicting operational fields
- Stale-record and status exceptions using agreed rules
- A prioritised clean-up plan with accountable review points
- A small sample of the proposed corrected output
- A findings review so the next decision is clear
The questions it answers
Separate safe clean-up from decisions that need a person.
Which fields are incomplete or inconsistent?
Each finding keeps its source context so your team can distinguish a formatting fix from a genuine conflict.
What should happen next?
The clean-up plan separates approved standardisation, human review, policy questions and system-rule changes.
01 / AGREE
Confirm the export and rules
We agree the fields, record limit, data-sharing method, reviewers and rules that may be applied safely.
02 / REVIEW
Prepare findings and exceptions
The source is checked against the agreed rules. Uncertain cases are isolated rather than silently changed.
03 / DECIDE
Review the practical next step
You receive the Snapshot and sample corrected output whether or not a wider implementation follows.
Human review required: Data Expose does not decide whether two people are the same, whether a candidate is suitable or eligible, whether right-to-work requirements are met, or whether a record should be retained or deleted. Those decisions remain with authorised agency staff.
See the deliverable before you enquire
A transparent synthetic example.
The sample uses invented record IDs and illustrative counts. It contains no real candidate data and is not a client case study, measured result or claim about a recruitment database.
Download the synthetic sample PDFSynthetic sample data
Use it to judge the structure, level of detail and human-review boundaries. A real Snapshot uses only the fields, rules and responsible reviewers agreed for your agency.
Low-friction first step
Would the one-page scope be useful?
Email Data Expose and we will send the exact inputs, outputs, boundaries and next steps. No long qualification form.